This policy is to guide CCS Graduate students seeking to change programs at the graduate level. Graduate students wishing to transition into an undergraduate degree should seek further guidance from the Admissions team and their Academic Advisor.
This policy refers to procedures for changing graduate degree subject disciplines, changing modes of study, and changing from one Graduate degree type to another (i.e. MA to MFA; MFA to MA).
Changing Graduate Degree Subject Discipline
MA / MFA Color and Materials Design
MA / MFA Transportation Design
MA / MFA User Experience Design
A student seeking to change from one of the above listed programs to another must do so by the first day of week 2 of the first semester, and must have been accepted by the receiving program chair.
Those seeking to change programs after this date, will be required to restart the program in the following academic year. Students cannot switch programs midway through the academic year. All in-person graduate degrees start in the Fall Semester. Students are unable to commence their studies in the Winter Semester.
MA / MFA Interdisciplinary Design
Graduate students can transfer into MA / MFA Interdisciplinary Design Studies at any time, with approval of Chairs and the Dean of Graduate Studies. A student seeking to transfer out of this program must do so by the first day of week 2 of the first semester, and must have been accepted by the receiving program chair. This does not apply to the MA in Art Education (see below).
MA Art Education
Students wishing to transfer into this program, or from it, will need to reapply through the Graduate Admissions Office.
Note: A student who is in the process of completing a CCS graduate degree and wishes to immediately start another in a different discipline, must apply through Graduate Admissions.
Changing Study Modes
MA / MFA Degrees (Design Programs)
All MA and MFA Design degrees are offered in both full- and part-time mode. However, only US citizens and permanent residents can study part-time. Eligible students can transfer from full-time to part-time mode, or vice versa through an approval process, and degree planning negotiation with the Program Chair and Academic Advisor.
MA User Experience Design (Online)
The MA in User Experience Design (Online) is structured and sequenced differently to the in-person MA degree. Transferring between these programs is not possible (a student may apply for direct entry to the MFA in Interdisciplinary Design Studies). International students taking this program must reside outside of the US.
Changing Graduate Degree Program (MA and MFA)
MA to MFA
A student may transfer from the MA to the MFA of the same program at any time during the first semester, with the approval of the program chair. Students transferring in the second semester will be required to complete specific courses for the MFA before starting their second year.
MFA to MA
A student may transfer from the MFA to the MA version of the same program at any time during the first semester. Students enrolled on the MFA may not transfer to the MA after the first day of week 2 of the Winter semester.
Graduation from the MA or MFA graduate design degrees requires the completion of a capstone project course(s). Capstone project courses cannot be replaced with other classes, including internships.
Two-year MA and three-year MFA in Transportation Design
A two-year MA and three-year MFA is offered in Transportation Design, providing a preliminary year of skills development. Students taking either the one-year MA or the two- and three-year MFA may change to the two-year MA under advice and guidance at any juncture deemed appropriate by the Department Chair. Students on the two-year MA may advance to the final year of the MFA, having met prerequisites with the agreement of the department chair.
Students on the two-year MA may not change to the one year MA. Students on the three-year MFA may not change to the two-year MFA.
Attendance Regulations for Graduation
Students must be enrolled and attending CCS* in the semester in which they plan to graduate (*unless on an online degree)
International Students
International Students are reminded that any change to their program of study, subject matter, degree type or duration needs to be reflected in their SEVIS record and printed on their I20 Form. Please contact the Global Engagement Office within 10 days of any change for an updated I20 Form, and to officially report the change. global@ccsdetroit.edu
Graduate Student Readmission
Graduate students returning to College for Creative Studies (CCS) after an absence of more than two consecutive academic years or students who seek readmission after suspension, must complete the Application for Readmission. Please check the Graduate Student Readmission Policy for further details.
The full-time teaching load for studio faculty is 18 contact hours and for faculty teaching lecture courses, nine contact hours per semester. There are faculty who teach both studio and lecture courses; three 3-credit courses are considered a full-time load irrespective of the contact hours. Complete the teaching assignment overload form when hours exceed this requirement.
You must log in to view this form. Please use the login form on the right to enter your CCS credentials and continue.
$1,000 Scholarly Publishing Award $1,000 Creative Publishing Award
Overview
The CCS Publishing Award, sponsored by the Office of Academic Affairs, will be awarded to two faculty or staff members who, in the two calendar years prior to the nomination deadline, published exemplary scholarly or creative work as determined by the selection committee. Published works, including monographs, creative works (e.g., novels or anthologies of poetry), exhibition catalogs, textbooks, edited editions, or journal articles, may be nominated. Two awards will be granted annually, one for scholarly publishing and the other for creative publishing. The cash award is taxable income.
Submitted works will be reviewed by a faculty and staff committee appointed by the Dean of Academic Affairs.
Committee Membership
The selection committee consists of eight voting members and an ex-officio. Current faculty members of the Library Committee, along with one elected staff member, serve a three-year term. The committee is responsible for coordinating the award process and selecting the winning submission in each category.
Amy Lazet, Digital Scholarship Librarian (staff representative)
Appointed Staff Member
Becca Pad, Ex-Officio
Submission Deadline
December 1, 2024
Eligibility
Current CCS faculty (full-time and adjunct) and staff with continuous appointments during the academic year of nomination and award are eligible. Publications from the last two calendar years, including those published prior to the author’s employment at CCS, are eligible. Previous recipients of the award are eligible again after three years. If faculty and staff serving on the CCS Publishing Award Committee choose to apply, they are ineligible to vote in the category of their submission. They will still be eligible to vote in the alternative category. CCS students are not eligible for this award.
Award Categories
Academic Publishing
Eligible submissions for the academic publishing category include books, journal articles, and essays. While the category is not restricted to peer-reviewed or refereed materials, submissions should demonstrate a high level of research intensity. If the work has undergone peer-reviewed or refereed, please indicate this on the application form.
Creative Publishing
Creative works for the creative publishing category include books (such as novels, monographs, anthologies of poetry, or authored children’s illustrated books) and journal or newspaper articles.
Criteria
Impact (for example – a unique contribution to or beyond the field of study including economic, social, cultural, environmental, or societal benefits)
Connection to the intended audience
Clarity (for example – clear and cohesive writing)
Quality (for example – work that demonstrates excellence through research methodology or creativity inquiry)
Nomination Process
Nominations and self-nominations for the CCS Publishing Award should be submitted through the nomination form by December 1, 2024. One nomination per author, per category; self-published works are not eligible. The following materials will need to be completed: ● Application form ● Current CV ● Copy of the submitted work ● A personal statement addressing how the candidate’s work reflects the award criteria ● One letter of support from a scholar or notable individual who can speak to the publication’s value ● Author’s headshot photograph (optional)
Award Announcement and Ceremony
The winners of the CCS Publishing Award in the categories of scholarly and creative publishing will be announced at the end of the winter semester and receive recognition during the CCS graduation ceremony.
Past Winners
Academic Year
Category
Name
Position
Achievement / Publication
Publisher / Journal andYear
2023-2024
Academic
Dr. Predrag Nikolic
Professor MA/MFA User Experience Design
AI Fantasy and (Anti) Co-Creative Machines: On Singularity Dadaism, Syntropic Counterpoints and Design
diid (disegno industriale) 80, no. 12, 2023
2023-2024
Creative
Melanie Demmer
Adjunct Instructor, Illustration
Cookie Kindness
Random House Children’s Books, 2022
2022-2023
Academic
Dr. Amy Ruopp
Dean of Undergraduate Studies, Department Chair and Associate Professor of Art Education
Encounters with Theory as Conceputal Medium and Creative Practice
Faculty/Staff wishing to propose a new degree program should meet with the appropriate academic Dean (dependent on if the program is graduate or undergraduate – hereafter called the “appropriate Dean”) to discuss the idea.
Dean Approval
If the Dean approves next steps, the faculty/staff member (hereafter called the “program request author”) completes the Preliminary Program Proposal form. The program request author will provide a program rationale, perform market research, anticipate costs, and consider program marketing strategies for the proposed program in response to the form’s questions. The Dean will use this form to introduce the program concept to College leadership and attain approval to move forward.
Upon receiving notice of leadership approval to move forward, the program request author will begin working on the Request for New Program form. The Dean and program request author will agree upon the level of Dean involvement in the Request for New Program form development. The program request author will discuss the proposed program with faculty and staff in departments and can be structured – for example, a work group can be developed – or unstructured and rely on individual conversations. The development of the program curriculum will incorporate both colleague input and market research completed.
Timeline Creation
The appropriate Dean will forward leadership approval of the Preliminary Program Proposal form to the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness. The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness will create a timeline for the program request based on accreditor schedules and share it with the program request author, appropriate Dean, and Dean of Academic Affairs. The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness will also provide the appropriate NASAD criteria/reference files and Plan Approval template
Request for New Program Form Completion
By the date determined on the timeline, the program request author will complete the Request for New Program form and the official internal approval process will begin.
Appropriate Dean Approval
The appropriate Dean will be the first to consider the submitted Request for New Program form and will work with the program request author to make any needed revisions.
College Leadership Approval
Upon approval by the appropriate Dean, the Request for New Program form will be forwarded to the Dean of Academic Affairs who will place the consideration of the proposed program on the Vice Presidents/Deans/President meeting agenda for College leadership consideration. The Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for signing the form on that group’s behalf if approved, and/or developing a plan to address the group’s concerns with the program request author and appropriate Dean. If approval is not granted, the Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for alerting the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness so that the timeline can be revised as necessary.
Upon approval by the College leadership team, the Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for ensuring that consideration of the program is placed on the Curriculum Committee agenda for a date agreed upon by the program request author and appropriate Dean. In addition to drafting the Request for New Program form, the program request author will complete the necessary docu- mentation (i.e. draft curriculum charts, New Course Requests, Change to Existing Course Requests) for submission.
Curriculum Committee Approval
The Curriculum Committee will consider the contents of the form and all submitted documentation and sign the form if they approve of the new program. If the approval is not granted, the Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for developing a plan to address the group’s concerns with the program request author and appropriate Dean. The Dean of Academic Affairs is also responsible for alerting the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness so that the timeline can be revised as necessary. Upon Request for New Program form approval by the Curriculum Committee, as evidenced by the Committee’s Chairs signature, the Dean of Academic Affairs will place the new program request on the agenda for the next Faculty Assembly
Faculty Assembly Approval
The Curriculum Committee Chair will introduce the program at the Faculty Assembly with the in-person support of the program request author and appropriate Dean, answer any questions that may arise, and ask that they approve the program request. The Faculty Executive Committee Chair will sign the form on the Faculty Assembly’s behalf if approved. If approval is not granted, the Dean of Academic Affairs will develop a plan to address the group’s concerns with the program request author and appropriate Dean. The Dean of Academic Affairs will also alert the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness so that the timeline can be revised as necessary.
Board of Trustees Education Committee Consideration
The appropriate Dean will introduce the program at the Board of Trustees Education Committee meeting and request that they recommend approval to the full Board. The Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for developing a plan to address the group’s concerns with the program request author and appropriate Dean if the Committee declines to recommend.
Upon Request for New Program form approval by the Board of Trustees Education Committee, the Dean of Academic Affairs will place the new pro- gram request on the agenda for the next Board of Trustees meeting.
Board of Trustees Approval
The appropriate Dean will present the proposed program to the Board and ask that they approve the program request. The Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for signing the form on the Board of Trustees’ behalf if approved, and/or developing a plan to address the group’s concerns with the program request author and appropriate Dean. If approval is not granted, the Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for alerting the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness so that the timeline can be revised as necessary.
Upon Request for New Program form approval by the Board of Trustees, the Dean of Academic Affairs will ensure the form is forwarded to the Registrar for processing.
External Approvals and Notifications
National Association of Schools of Art and Design (NASAD)
Plan Approval Development
The program request author will work with the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness, appropriate Dean, and Dean of Academic Affairs to develop the program Plan Approval document. The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness is responsible for requesting needed information from College collaborators (i.e. Library, Enrollment Services, Administration and Finance).
Consultative Review
The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness will send a firm draft of the Plan Approval to the President, all VPS, and all Deans approximately one month prior to the final submission date for editing and approval. The Dean of Academic Affairs will send this copy to the College’s NASAD liaison and request their consultation and input.
Plan Approval Submission
The program request author will work with the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness, appropriate Dean, and Dean of Academic Affairs to develop the pro- gram Plan Approval document. The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness is responsible for requesting needed information from College collaborators (i.e. Library, Enrollment Services, Administration and Finance).
Consultative Review
The Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness will send a firm draft of the Plan Approval to the President, all VPS, and all Deans approximately one month prior to the final submission date for editing and approval. The Dean of Academic Affairs will send this copy to the College’s NASAD liaison and request their consultation and input follows with a digital copy to the College’s NASAD Liaison.
The Dean of Academic Affairs will also send a program introduction email to College personnel who should be advised of the new program and its anticipated launch date at this time. The email will clearly state that the program is not yet accredited and cannot be discussed publicly. Recipients will include representatives from:
Admissions and Enrollment Services
Academic Advising and Registration
Marketing and Communication
Center for Tutoring and Learning
Global Engagement
Corporate Relations
Career Development
Housing
Academic Facilities
Financial Aid
Commission on Accreditation Response
NASAD typically offers a response from its Commission on Accreditation within 90 days of the Plan Approval submittal. The response will typically approve the program outright, approve the program with a request for a Progress Report(s) on concerning aspects, or defer the decision on approval based on major concerns. If a Plan Approval is deferred, the College has the right to provide a response to the concerns, but it typically will not be considered until the next review cycle.
Progress Reports
NASAD will sometimes request that the institution provide a Progress Report for one or more concerns outlined in their Commission on Accreditation written response. The deadlines for these Progress Reports are listed in the request. The Dean of Academic Affairs, Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness, appropriate Dean, and program request author will work together to create these documents.
Final Approval
When an undergraduate program graduates three students, or when a graduate program graduates two students, a Final Approval for Listing must be submitted to NASAD containing the transcripts for those students, published degree requirements, an explanation of any deviation between the published degree requirements and the transcripts, and a summary of any changes to the degree program since it was approved in the Plan Approval stage. The Dean of Academic Affairs, Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness, appropriate Dean, and program Chair will work together to create these documents.
Submission and Response Schedule
NASAD’s Commission on Accreditation meets every April and October. Any documentation submitted for consideration needs to be received by their office by the first of March or September. Commission on Accreditation responses are typically provided within 90 days of their meeting. If approval is not granted, the Dean of Academic Affairs is responsible for alerting the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness so that the timeline can be revised as necessary.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC)
Necessary Documentation
HLC categorizes new program proposals using their own metrics. Dependent on how the program is categorized, different documentation is required. The Dean of Academic Affairs, appropriate Dean, and Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness will determine the category and work with the program Chair to complete the necessary documentation.
Submission and Response Schedule
Submissions to HLC are accepted on a rolling basis. The length of response time expected is dependent on whether HLC determines that the decision can be made via desk review (up to 90 days), panel review (up to six months), or if a site visit is necessary (nine months). Site visits include a cost to the institution.
Department of Education
Necessary Documentation
The DOE must be notified of, and in some cases approve, all new programs or existing programs seeking to be offered in distance mode. The Vice President of Enrollment and Student Services is responsible for making this request to the DOE and submitting the appropriate documentation, including the program approvals from NASAD and HLC.
Submission and Response Schedule
Submissions to the DOE are made on a rolling basis. Responses may take up to 90 days.
Program Specific Accreditors
Programs may have discipline specific accreditors with their own requirements and standards. As these differ by organization, they are handled individually. Parties responsible for ensuring the program-specific accreditation reporting is completed include the appropriate program Chair, the appropriate Dean, the Dean of Academic Affairs, and the Director of Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Assessment of New Programs
New Degree-Granting Academic Program Assessment
New Degree-Granting Academic Program Assessments are completed after the first year of program launch, and then again after the third year of program launch. The Dean of Academic Affairs works with new program Chairs and the appropriate Dean to schedule the assessments. Chairs are required to submit a dossier of documentation/evidence to the appropriate Dean in preparation for each of the reviews. New programs will submit the New Academic Program Assessment forms as part of their comprehensive review dossier at year six.
Institutional and Program Learning Outcomes
Each year, each degree-granting academic program completes an assessment of how well they delivered both an Institutional Learning Outcome (ILO) and a Program Learning Outcome (PLO) in their curricular content. These reports are submitted to the Assessment Committee at the close of each academic year.
Comprehensive and External Evaluator Reviews
The Assessment Committee offers a review of scheduled Comprehensive Review of academic programs every six years. Prior to the Review, the program creates a dossier of materials for consideration, similar to that which was created for the New Program reviews in the first and third years. The areas evaluated include program community development, institution community development, and progressive curricular strategies.
This Comprehensive Review will take place in the same year as the external review, in which an industry professional will perform a campus visit and consider student work outcomes and industry relevance.
Student, faculty, and staff focus groups would be convened as part of the review process to converse with the external evaluator and the Assessment Committee reviewers.
Student Course Evaluations
Each semester, students submit course evaluations that assess the effectiveness of their instructors and the course. Program Chairs consider these evaluations each semester and refine courses and offer faculty mentorship/training as needed
Faculty Evaluations
CCS full-time faculty are reviewed annually. Student outcomes and course evaluations are considered as part of this evaluation. New faculty, both full-time and adjunct, are evaluated twice in their first semester.
Students seeking a double major must meet studio requirements for both majors. Courses, including foundations (18 credits), liberal arts (42 credits), studio electives (9 credits), and general electives (6 credits) as part of one major, may be used, when appropriate, to satisfy the requirements of the second major. 75 credit hours may be shared between the two majors.
Each plan for the major must be developed in consultation with and approved by a Department Chair. Students wishing to declare a double major must complete the Double Major Declaration form that is available in the Academic Advising and Registration Office (AARO). Students must submit the completed form to AARO with the approval of the second major’s Department Chair. One of the majors must be designated as the primary program of study on the form.
Second Major After Graduation
Students may complete a second major after graduation by applying through the CCS Admissions Office. Requirements from the first major are evaluated, and when appropriate, foundations, studio, and liberal arts coursework from the first major may be applied to the second major. Admitted transfer students are sent a potential Transfer Credit Evaluation (TCE) and curriculum chart via email shortly after being admitted. The TCE outlines which courses have been accepted for transfer credit and how they apply toward your CCS degree.