The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) differs from prior technological advancements to the design processes due to its ability to automate and potentially replace large areas of the design process that have until now required human critical/creative thinking. Areas such as ideation, iteration, and development. Since these areas have traditionally been considered essential contributors to a design’s conceptual content, the use of AI here has raised philosophical, ethical, and legal questions around design authenticity, authorship, and bias. As AI and its use within the transportation design field continues to evolve, our program will monitor and adjust its policies surrounding AI accordingly which should also be followed in tandem with the CCS Institutional AI Statement.
Remaining true to its vision and mission, GRT will ensure the development of world class creative/critical thinkers capable of meeting and exceeding professional expectations. To this end, GRT will continue to prioritize the acquisition of all skills, knowledge, and sensibilities of the traditional design process (without the use of AI), while also carefully exploring the ethical integration of AI into the design process and GRT curriculum as deemed appropriate.
AI may be used in the GRT program only to augment but not lesson or replace the learning of the traditional design process (that is any/all established/standard tools and methodologies being practiced within the transportation design profession prior to the use of AI). For example, if an assignment calls for a specified quantity of effort to be made via traditional means, this requirement must be met. AI, however, can be used to create additional effort above and beyond the specified quantity required to be done traditionally.
AI usage will closely adhere to the principles and practices of the GRT and CCS Academic Integrity Policy, and be governed by the general guidelines below:
Use (in part or in entirety) of any pre-existing or AI generated outcome/asset (2D/3D/4D image, model/part, video clip, animation, animated sequences, etc.) is not allowed:
- If the asset is being used in place of any design process effort/outcome that the student is expected and or required to perform/create via a traditional design process/method
- If the asset can be recognized/identified as not being created or significantly modified by the student who is presenting it as part of their work (either directly incorporating it into a design deliverable, or using it as supporting background/situational context)
Unless:
- Its use is discussed, approved, and properly cited to eliminate any potential incident of plagiarism.
- It is clear/understood that the asset was not required or intended to be designed by the student. Such as assets that are generic, ubiquitous, and or part of the public domain (logos/badges, nuts/bolts, trees/bushes/rocks, human/animal mannequins, architectural elements, material patterns/textures etc.).
- It is clear/understood that the asset is part of the research process where there is an expectation for the student to gather externally sourced content.
Failure to comply with the above guidelines may result in disciplinary action up to and including a failing grade and or suspension from the institution.
The CCS Academic Integrity Policy has been revised to include AI-related concerns.