It is the College’s goal to annually evaluate the performance of each employee. The purpose of the evaluation process is to provide an opportunity for the supervisor and employee to review the prior year’s work performance. This process should include conversations related to the strengths and weaknesses in your employee’s performance, the development of future objectives, and your support and encouragement in assisting them to reach their full potential. The evaluation process helps to promote better communication between you and your employee, allows your employee input, and enables attention to be focused on job performance standards. As you communicate the performance appraisal, your employee needs to understand performance expectations and your employee should be provided the opportunity to respond and discuss any issues that may arise. Feedback concerning job satisfaction, career goals, and position responsibility are encouraged during the appraisal and throughout the year.
Begin your Employee Self Evaluation.
Supervisors
The following employees and supervisors have completed their evaluations. Please review them by clicking on each of their names in the table below.
Below is a list of reviews that your employees and supervisors have submitted, listed by department.
Employee Evaluations
Employees who report directly to you
advertising
Employees who report to Ryan Ansel
Employee reviews by Ryan Ansel
Art Education
Employees who report to Amy Ruopp
Employee reviews by Amy Ruopp
Communication design
Employees who report to Susan LaPorte
Employee reviews by Susan LaPorte
Craft and Material Studies
Employees who report to Kim Harty
Employee reviews by Kim Harty
Employees who report to Tom Madden
Employee reviews by Tom Madden
Entertainment Arts
Employees who report to Tim Flattery
Employee: John Dempsey Job Title: part time instructor- adjunct Department: Entertainment Arts Supervisor Email: tflattery@collegeforcreativestudies.edu Review Date: July 24, 2019| Score | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Work | STRENGTH (4) | I try and anticipate what students need available to them (paper, drawing tools and etc) in order for them to get the most out of each class activity. |
| Dependability | STRENGTH (4) | Thus far we have had no issues or circumstances that have caused any major class interruptions. |
| Job Knowledge | DEMONSTRATING (3) | Still learning student needs as they relate to their area of study. Coming from a traditional studio experience I am trying to shape the class to best help individual student’s art studies and practice. |
| Interactive/Effective Communication | DEMONSTRATING (3) | I do actively seek out student feedback in different ways, written survey, question sessions, over the semester. |
| Emotional Intelligence | DEMONSTRATING (3) | I try to treat students as individuals and enjoy them for their unique contributions and viewpoints. |
| Management Ability | STRENGTH (4) | Try and use a variety of methods to provide pertinent information to students particularly leading up to each individual class meeting, ex: school email, BlackBoard, class announcements and handouts. |
| Teamwork | STRENGTH (4) | I am mindful of the support and help provided by the Entertainment Arts Department and CCS employees that make it all possible. (Shima, Dayna) |
| Agility | DEMONSTRATING (3) | This hasn’t been a large issue. I do encourage students to take advantage of Entertainment Arts activities that may conflict with our Saturday class sessions. Students have the option of making up class time if they choose to participate in the many opportunities available to them. |
Goals
-
- Students’ classwork feeds directly into their success in their other classes, their art practice and their educational goals.
-
- Students both feel better about, and improve, their drawing skills.
-
- Students find observational drawing as a viable source of inspiration and subject matter.
-
- Reinforce student’s engagement with their immediate environment.
Accomplishments
-
- The course, Gesture Drawing 232B, has evolved to take advantage of our long sessions and explore students’ environs as subject matter. (emphasis on field trips)
-
- Create a workshop/studio environment that runs as a collaboration between students to advance their goals. I draw along with the students to try create an atmosphere of collaboration.
-
- Learning more and more regarding student needs and their programs of study.
-
- Students learning about Detroit and its many great places, particularly students attending from other places/countries that may feel uncomfortable in Detroit.
Comments
Continued communication regarding EA department goals and how Gesture Drawing 232B fits into student needs.
Created on July 24, 2019 at 10:18 am Updated at July 24, 2019 at 10:18 amEmployee reviews by Tim Flattery
Fashion Accessories Design
Employees who report to Aki Choklat
Employee reviews by Aki Choklat
Fine art
Employees who report to Valerie Jenkins
Employee reviews by Valerie Jenkins
Foundation
Employees who report to Elena Arnaoutova
Employee reviews by Elena Arnaoutova
Illustration
Employees who report to Don Kilpatrick
Employee reviews by Don Kilpatrick
Interior Design
Employees who report to Sandra Olave
Employee reviews by Sandra Olave
Liberal Arts
Employees who report to Lisa Catani
Employee reviews by Lisa Catani
Photography
Employees who report to Bruce Feldman
Employee reviews by Bruce Feldman
product design
Employees who report to Vincenzo Iavicoli
Employee reviews by Vincenzo Iavicoli
transportation Design
Employees who report to Paul Snyder
Employee reviews by Paul Snyder
Enter each employee evaluation on the Supervisor Evaluations page. Once you have entered your information, click submit. You may edit your entries by clicking on the Edit links of the employee evaluations you’ve entered below. Please complete the supervisor evaluation process by August 23, 2019.