It is the College’s goal to annually evaluate the performance of each employee. The purpose of the evaluation process is to provide an opportunity for the supervisor and employee to review the prior year’s work performance. This process should include conversations related to the strengths and weaknesses in your employee’s performance, the development of future objectives, and your support and encouragement in assisting them to reach their full potential. The evaluation process helps to promote better communication between you and your employee, allows your employee input, and enables attention to be focused on job performance standards. As you communicate the performance appraisal, your employee needs to understand performance expectations and your employee should be provided the opportunity to respond and discuss any issues that may arise. Feedback concerning job satisfaction, career goals, and position responsibility are encouraged during the appraisal and throughout the year.
Begin your Employee Self Evaluation.
Supervisors
The following employees and supervisors have completed their evaluations. Please review them by clicking on each of their names in the table below.
Below is a list of reviews that your employees and supervisors have submitted, listed by department.
Employee Evaluations
Employees who report directly to you
advertising
Employees who report to Ryan Ansel
Employee reviews by Ryan Ansel
Art Education
Employees who report to Amy Ruopp
Employee reviews by Amy Ruopp
Communication design
Employees who report to Susan LaPorte
Employee reviews by Susan LaPorte
Craft and Material Studies
Employees who report to Kim Harty
Employee reviews by Kim Harty
Employees who report to Tom Madden
Employee reviews by Tom Madden
Entertainment Arts
Employees who report to Tim Flattery
Employee reviews by Tim Flattery
Fashion Accessories Design
Employees who report to Aki Choklat
Employee reviews by Aki Choklat
Fine art
Employees who report to Valerie Jenkins
Employee reviews by Valerie Jenkins
Foundation
Employees who report to Elena Arnaoutova
Employee reviews by Elena Arnaoutova
Illustration
Employees who report to Don Kilpatrick
Employee reviews by Don Kilpatrick
Interior Design
Employees who report to Sandra Olave
Employee reviews by Sandra Olave
Liberal Arts
Employees who report to Lisa Catani
Employee: Karen Larson Job Title: Adjunct Faculty Department: Art History Supervisor Email: lcatani@collegeforcreativestudies.edu Review Date: August 5, 2019| Score | Comment | |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Work | STRENGTH (4) | This past year I have been acclimating to teaching at the College and a lecture course (art history). This has been a challenging but gratifying experience. I have earnestly tried to implement suggestions given to me by the Chair and listed on the student evaluation forms. |
| Dependability | STRENGTH (4) | I have been consistent and conscientious with my responsibilities as an adjunct. |
| Job Knowledge | DEMONSTRATING (3) | I am actively engaged in the practice of photography and its history. With that said, this past semester I have also been fine-tuning the class time with more interactive exercises and experiences to engage my students. |
| Interactive/Effective Communication | DEMONSTRATING (3) | I welcome suggestions and invite feedback. |
| Emotional Intelligence | STRENGTH (4) | I try to encourage discussion by bringing up multiple viewpoints. Through raising questions, I believe it situates the class to delve deeper into the course content and to parse apart the “how” and/or “why”. |
| Management Ability | DEMONSTRATING (3) | N/A |
| Teamwork | DEMONSTRATING (3) | I am happy to participate and converse, however since my time on campus is one day a week it would be difficult to say that I have a robust chance to collaborate. |
| Agility | STRENGTH (4) | This is one of the unique aspects of teaching that I enjoy in my opinion. |
Goals
-
- Create study guide recaps for each class to be posted on blackboard, so that the students can review or refer to them.
-
- Continue to develop engagement strategies for the course.
-
- Write and apply to deliver a short paper for the “Ways of Seeing”: Women and Photography in Scotland. Though realistically my paper may not be chosen, I believe going through the process is important
Accomplishments
-
- I prepared the course lecture materials for the class, which required an extensive amount of time culling together historic and contemporary materials.
-
- The class group work that was implemented in the winter semester, was surprising successful and brought an even greater sense of community discussion with everyone in the class.
-
- Over the past academic year, I have filled out my personal photo book library to provide additional resources for students and my own personal research.
Comments
I welcome continued feedback and mentorship. Also, I appreciate the opportunities and am grateful for the resources and support that CCS provides (ranging from exhibition participation, extended library/image resources to parking).
Created on August 5, 2019 at 7:55 pm Updated at August 5, 2019 at 7:55 pmEmployee reviews by Lisa Catani
Photography
Employees who report to Bruce Feldman
Employee reviews by Bruce Feldman
product design
Employees who report to Vincenzo Iavicoli
Employee reviews by Vincenzo Iavicoli
transportation Design
Employees who report to Paul Snyder
Employee reviews by Paul Snyder
Enter each employee evaluation on the Supervisor Evaluations page. Once you have entered your information, click submit. You may edit your entries by clicking on the Edit links of the employee evaluations you’ve entered below. Please complete the supervisor evaluation process by August 23, 2019.