Supervisor Evaluation – Vince Carducci

It is the College’s goal to annually evaluate the performance of each employee. The purpose of the evaluation process is to provide an opportunity for the supervisor and employee to review the prior year’s work performance. This process should include conversations related to the strengths and weaknesses in your employee’s performance, the development of future objectives, and your support and encouragement in assisting them to reach their full potential. The evaluation process helps to promote better communication between you and your employee, allows your employee input, and enables attention to be focused on job performance standards.  As you communicate the performance appraisal, your employee needs to understand performance expectations and your employee should be provided the opportunity to respond and discuss any issues that may arise.  Feedback concerning job satisfaction, career goals, and position responsibility are encouraged during the appraisal and throughout the year.

Begin your Employee Self Evaluation.

Supervisors

The following employees and supervisors have completed their evaluations. Please review them by clicking on each of their names in the table below.

Below is a list of reviews that your employees and supervisors have submitted, listed by department.

Employee Evaluations

Employees who report directly to you

Employee: Ashlei Watson Job Title: Coordinator Department: Undergraduate Studies Supervisor Email: vcarducci@collegeforcreativestudies.edu Review Date: July 29, 2019

	Score	Comment
Quality of Work	LEADING (5)	I am able to produce high quality work quickly and present it well. Due to this ability, I have garnered a strong institutional reputation. I actively seek and appreciate new challenges that require deep research and the opportunity to develop creative and thorough responses.
Dependability	LEADING (5)	I’m known as a reliable and trusted colleague and use my time management and organization skills to help others. My work is usually submitted days before it is due, rarely needs more than a cursory edit, and meets executive-level presentation and content standards.
Job Knowledge	LEADING (5)	I develop and refine processes to ensure that my job functions are completed in the most effective and efficient manner. I continuously develop my skills through training and research in the areas of process development, writing, and work flow coordination.
Interactive/Effective Communication	LEADING (5)	I am an engaged member of the College community and am trusted by colleagues to have the answer they are seeking, point them in the right direction, and/or aid in resolution of their issue(s). I am an active listener and clarify my understanding through questions and feedback.
Emotional Intelligence	LEADING (5)	I typically respond to difficult/unexpected circumstances by starting from a place of personal integrity rather than emotional reaction. Taking a moment to readjust slows a situation down and gives all involved the breathing room to assess their own responses. Conflict can foster growth and clarity.
Management Ability	LEADING (5)	Not Applicable.
Teamwork	LEADING (5)	I have good working relationships and communicate in a way that ensures people feel respected and recognized. I identify, develop, and implement work flows and processes that lessen staff burden, meet institution need, and provide needed archival documentation.
Agility	LEADING (5)	I am able to be flexible and respond quickly to shifting priorities and changing circumstances because I have strong processes and develop thorough project plans that include contingencies. I have good judgement and problem solving skills.

Goals

1. 1. To attain a position that will utilize my current skills to benefit the institution while providing the opportunity for further development.

1. 1. To advocate and help lead an initiative to streamline the College’s business processes, mitigating waste of resources, talent, etc. while improving stakeholder experiences.

1. 1. To strongly advocate for institution cultural change via clear, honest communication and by modeling collaborative, respectful, and empowering behavior.

1. 1. To aid the division in their curricular refinement efforts through research, bench marking of other institutions, and the development of clear, coherent documentation.

Accomplishments

1. 1. I handled a deeply affecting professional situation this year by persistently focusing on the facts and boundary setting while modeling respect, consideration, and professionalism.

1. 1. Through work flow issue research and bench marking of other institutions, I developed a position proposal that would utilize my skills and strengths and offer tremendous benefit to the College.

1. 1. I developed a proposal, inclusive of procedures, workflow, and forms, for a CCS Institutional Review Board that would meet and exceed HLC accreditation standards.

1. 1. I strengthened my research, writing, and coordination skills by working with the Community Arts Partnerships office on several grant proposals and an anniversary exhibition.

Comments

I could offer substantial benefit to the institution were I to be in a position with a wider scope of responsibilities. I have proven my capacity and abilities and would appreciate your advocacy in creating the proposed position, which would marry my skills with clear, evidenced institution need.

Created on July 29, 2019 at 11:31 am Updated at July 29, 2019 at 11:31 am

advertising

Employees who report to Ryan Ansel

Employee reviews by Ryan Ansel

Art Education

Employees who report to Amy Ruopp

Employee reviews by Amy Ruopp

Communication design

Employees who report to Susan LaPorte

Employee reviews by Susan LaPorte

Craft and Material Studies

Employees who report to Kim Harty

Employee reviews by Kim Harty

Employees who report to Tom Madden

Employee reviews by Tom Madden

Entertainment Arts

Employees who report to Tim Flattery

Employee reviews by Tim Flattery

Fashion Accessories Design

Employees who report to Aki Choklat

Employee reviews by Aki Choklat

Fine art

Employees who report to Valerie Jenkins

Employee reviews by Valerie Jenkins

Foundation

Employees who report to Elena Arnaoutova

Employee reviews by Elena Arnaoutova

Illustration

Employees who report to Don Kilpatrick

Employee reviews by Don Kilpatrick

Interior Design

Employees who report to Sandra Olave

Employee reviews by Sandra Olave

Liberal Arts

Employees who report to Lisa Catani

Employee reviews by Lisa Catani

Photography

Employees who report to Bruce Feldman

Employee reviews by Bruce Feldman

product design

Employees who report to Vincenzo Iavicoli

Employee reviews by Vincenzo Iavicoli

transportation Design

Employees who report to Paul Snyder

Employee reviews by Paul Snyder

---

Enter each employee evaluation on the Supervisor Evaluations page. Once you have entered your information, click submit. You may edit your entries by clicking on the Edit links of the employee evaluations you’ve entered below. Please complete the supervisor evaluation process by August 23, 2019.

Your Evaluation Reviews