Supervisor Evaluation – Anne Beck

It is the College’s goal to annually evaluate the performance of each employee. The purpose of the evaluation process is to provide an opportunity for the supervisor and employee to review the prior year’s work performance. This process should include conversations related to the strengths and weaknesses in your employee’s performance, the development of future objectives, and your support and encouragement in assisting them to reach their full potential. The evaluation process helps to promote better communication between you and your employee, allows your employee input, and enables attention to be focused on job performance standards.  As you communicate the performance appraisal, your employee needs to understand performance expectations and your employee should be provided the opportunity to respond and discuss any issues that may arise.  Feedback concerning job satisfaction, career goals, and position responsibility are encouraged during the appraisal and throughout the year.

Begin your Employee Self Evaluation.

Supervisors

The following employees have completed their evaluations. Please review them by clicking on each of their names in the table below.

Below is a list of reviews that your employees have submitted.

Employee Evaluations

Employees who report directly to you

Employee: Greg Fraser
Job Title: Director of Information Technology Services
Department: Information Technology Services
Supervisor Email: abeck@collegeforcreativestudies.edu
Review Date: August 23, 2019

Score Comment
Quality of Work LEADING (5)
Dependability LEADING (5)
Job Knowledge STRENGTH (4)
Interactive/Effective Communication STRENGTH (4)
Emotional Intelligence LEADING (5)
Management Ability STRENGTH (4)
Teamwork STRENGTH (4)
Agility LEADING (5)

Goals

    1. Goals are pending the pending changes we’re talking about

Accomplishments

    1. Increasing temawork within ITS, paving the way for what’s next. Use of Trello, weekly tech meetings, etc.
    1. Maintaining and upgrading technology infrastructure with little to no noticeable downtime. Upgrading VMware to rail on Ford Campus and upgrading hardware at the TC.
    1. Streamlining processes that had grown too cumbersome or were no longer needed. Removing wireless registration is one good example.
    1. Continued progress with information security, policies, and training.

Comments

Created on August 23, 2019 at 12:36 pm
Updated at August 23, 2019 at 12:36 pm

Campus security, facilities

Employees who report to Mike Bruggeman

No Entries Found

Employee reviews by Mike Bruggeman

No Entries Found

Enter each employee evaluation on the Supervisor Evaluations page. Once you have entered your information, click submit. You may edit your entries by clicking on the Edit links of the employee evaluations you’ve entered below. Please complete the supervisor evaluation process by August 23, 2019.

Your Evaluation Reviews

No Entries Found