External Evaluator Report External Evaluator Report Evalulator Details External Evaluator Name: * Evaluator Email: * Evaluator Phone: * Evaluator Website/URL: Date of Evaluation: * Department Evaluated: * SelectAdvertisingArt EducationArt PracticeCommunication DesignCraft and Material StudiesEntertainment ArtsFashion DesignFilmFoundationsIllustrationInterior DesignLiberal ArtsProduct DesignTransportation DesignGraduate – Color and MaterialsGraduate – User Experience DesignGraduate – Interaction DesignGraduate – Transportation DesignNew Option Evaluation Information Please be as comprehensive as possible. Whom did you work with and what did you review? Please check the following Reviewed student work Met with faculty members Met with students Reviewed curriculum Reviewed Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO’s) Reviewed Program Learning Outcomes (PLO’s) Reviewed Course Learning Outcomes (CLO’s) Reviewed Course Descriptions Describe your visit to CCS in as much detail as possible. * How well does the mission statement align with program and course learning outcomes? * Are program learning outcomes measurable and do they achieve anticipated learning outcomes? Provide any evidence of this. * Evidence of Mastery Describe evidence of mastery at each level of the program. This could be artifacts, assessments ect. Freshmen and Sophomore Level Describe evidence of mastery for Freshmen and Sophomore level. This could be artifacts, assessments, experiential learning etc. How would you rate this? * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Junior and Senior Level Describe evidence of mastery for Junior and Senior level. This could be artifacts, assessments, experiential learning etc. How would you rate this? * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Graduate Level Describe evidence of mastery for Graduate level. This could be artifacts, assessments, experiential learning etc. How would you rate this? * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Questionnaire Rate the overall assement of the curriculum. * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate the facilites and access to resources: * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate use of the Learning Management System (Canvas) regarding consistent use and clear communication. * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate your perception of Seniors readiness to be competitive in the work force? * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate the presence of diversity, equity, and inclusion content throughout the curriculum: * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate the faculty members pedagogical competency: * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? Rate your perception of student engagement and ability to talk about the program: * Poor Needs work Average Acceptable Excellent Why did you choose this rating? File Upload Drop a file here or click to upload Choose File Maximum file size: 134.22MB If you need to upload any supporting documentation or additional comments please do so here. Art Education Questions Looking forward, the Art Education program intends to transform the current teacher certification into an MAT. Based on your evaluation, what strengths can we build on, and where are there gaps we can fill as we move this to the graduate level? * Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions and Recommendations Evaluator Signature signature keyboard Clear I believe that the facts stated in this document are true. If you are human, leave this field blank. Submit